Monday, July 6, 2009

FAQs on E-Verify

The National Conference of State Legislatures has published a document with frequently-asked questions about e-verify: http://www.ncsl.org/?tabid=13127.

The FAQs answer the following questions
  • What is Basic Pilot/E-Verify?
  • When and how was it created?
  • When will E-Verify expire?
  • How does E-Verify work?
  • What is the current usage and capacity?
  • How well does E-Verify work?
  • How is it enforced?
  • What is required of federal contractors?
  • What states currently address the use of E-Verify?
Although the document purports to have been updated on June 30, 2009, some information is out-of-date, so be careful using it. For example, the FAQs say that the requirement for federal contractors to use e-verify has been "delayed until February 20." In fact, that delay is now September 8, 2009, as noted here and here.


Thursday, July 2, 2009

ICE starts workplace immigration crackdown


The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency issued Notices of Inspection (NOIs) to 652 businesses nationwide yesterday. This is more than ICE issued in all of the last fiscal year. The notices warn the employers that ICE will be examining their records to ensure that the companies have been complying with employment verification procedures.

This focus on employers is consistent with the Obama administration's promises to direct resources in the worksite enforcement program towards the criminal prosecution of employers who knowingly hire illegal workers in order to target the root cause of illegal immigration. See this blog post for more details.


For yesterday's ICE news release, see here. It states that
The 652 businesses being presented with a NOI today for a Form I-9 audit have been selected for inspection as a result of leads and information obtained through other investigative means. Due to the ongoing, law enforcement sensitive nature of these audits, the names and locations of the businesses will not be released at this time.

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

H-1B cap count updated - now 44,800

USCIS has updated the H-1B cap count. As of June 30, 2009, the agency has 44,800 cases against the regular (non-Master's) H-1B cap, compared with 47,500 on May 29. For more information, see the previous blog post here.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

New State Department Pamphlet on Nonimmigrant Rights


The Department of State has published a pamphlet educating nonimmigrant visa holders on their rights. The pamphlet covers the visa process, important documents, workplace and employee rights, human trafficking, and how to file a complaint. This is a very useful document, not just for immigrants. As quoted in the publication,
The U.S. Government has issued this pamphlet to honor the rule of law and uphold the dignity of all who come to this country. The U.S. Government is committed to combating human trafficking and labor rights violations.

Friday, June 26, 2009

Obama tells lawmakers immigration a priority - The Boston Globe


Obama tells lawmakers immigration a priority - The Boston Globe


President Obama said yesterday that a bipartisan bill on the sensitive and volatile political issue will be difficult but must get underway this year. He spoke after he and members of his administration met with Congresspeople from both parties. The meeting was intended to begin mapping a plan to build support for an immigration measure that the president has said he would like to pass later this year or early next year, according to a senior White House official.

Posted using ShareThis

Monday, June 22, 2009

CIS resumes Premium Processing for I-140s

CIS has just announced that it will resume Premium Processing for I-140 petitions, starting on June 29. The following petitions will be affected:
  • EB-1 Aliens with Extraordinary Ability;
  • EB-1 Outstanding Professors and Researchers;
  • EB-2, Members of Professions with Advanced Degrees or Exceptional Ability not seeking a National Interest Waiver;
  • EB-3 Professionals,
  • EB-3 Skilled Workers, and
  • EB-3 Workers other than Skilled Workers and Professionals.
Premium Processing guarantees a decision within 15 days for an additional government filing fee of $1000. The decision could be an approval, denial, request for additional evidence, or some other action.

See the CIS website and Press Release for details.


CBP issues Fact Sheet on Automatic Visa Revalidation


The US Customs and Border Protection Agency (CBP) recently published a fact sheet about automatic visa revalidation. This revalidation allows a nonimmigrant to travel to Canada or Mexico for less than 30 days, and return using an expired visa if the foreign national also has an unexpired I-94. The provision applies to people who are returning in a different status to that on their visa, as well as to people who have had their initial status extended. For example, a person can return from a short trip to Canada with an expired L-1 visa stamp and an L-1 extension approval notice with an unexpired I-94. Another example would be a person returning from a short trip to Mexico, and using an expired F-1 visa stamp and a change of status H-1B approval notice to enter.

The revalidation provision does NOT apply if the foreign national:

  • has applied for a visa while on that trip to Canada or Mexico;
  • is from Iran, Syria, Sudan or Cuba; or
  • entered under the Visa Waiver Program.
CBP recommends that people who intend to use Automatic Visa Revalidation bring a copy of the fact sheet with them when they travel.

Friday, June 19, 2009

Immigration raids deemed abusive by panel

The San Francisco Chronicle today reported that a national commission has blasted the federal government for its tactics in a series of workplace immigration raids. The commission was set up by the United Food and Commercial Workers, and the panel included Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Dennis Hayashi, UC Davis Law Professor Bill Ong Hing and others.

The commission found that US immigration agents had "violated workers' rights and traumatized communities." The article explains that
The report described the 2006 Swift raids in which thousands of workers - most of them U.S. citizens or legal immigrants - were held by heavily armed ICE agents for up to eight hours without food, water or the opportunity to use a bathroom or a telephone.

Testimony alleged racial profiling and violations of constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and detention without due process. Out of an entire Swift workforce of 12,000, ICE had warrants identifying 133 suspects of identity theft, the report said.

[emphasis added]

The comments on the newspaper's website show the level of hatred against undocumented workers. Most commentators ignore the fact that most of the people rounded up were lawful, even US citizens in some cases.


Thursday, June 18, 2009

I have a green card, can I live outside the US for a few years?

People with permanent residence (green cards) often inquire as to whether they can live outside the US and still maintain their permanent residence (PR). Many people believe that if the green card holder returns to the US at least once every 12 months, there will be no risk of losing permanent residence. Immigration regulations do state that if a PR is outside the US for one continuous year, there is a presumption that PR has been abandoned. However, DHS (Department of Homeland Security) can decide that a person has abandoned PR after they have been gone for less than a year. The key is whether the person intended the stay abroad to be temporary, not the length of time outside the US.

If you want to live outside the US for 6 months or more, it is critical that you can show your intention to return to the US. This intent can be shown by as many of the following as possible:

1. Continuing to file US tax returns;

2. Keeping a house or other residence here;

3. Putting furniture and other belongings in storage rather than selling them;

4. Having some immediate family members staying in the US;

5. Definite plans to return to a job or studies in the US;

6. Maintaining memberships in clubs, church groups, etc in the US.

We recommend getting a reentry permit if you will be on an extended stay outside the US of 6 months or longer. A reentry permit allows a permanent resident or conditional resident to apply for admission to the US upon returning from abroad during the permit’s validity, without having to obtain a returning resident visa from the U.S. Embassy or consulate. A reentry permit does not guarantee admission into the United States. Aliens with reentry permits are still subject to inspection at the port of entry and may be denied admission if they are inadmissible.

Reentry permits are generally valid for 2 years from the date the reentry permit was issued. A 2nd reentry permit might be approved for another 2 years, and therafter they are approved for one year at a time. You should apply for this benefit before leaving the United States. Ideally, you will file at least a few months before you leave, to allow time for the biometrics appointment to be scheduled before you travel.

For more information, please see these prior blog posts: http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/search/label/reentry%20permit

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

State Department to open new passport offices


The Department of State (DOS) issued a press release announcing that it plans to expand the existing network of 21 passport agencies and centers nationwide by opening new passport agencies in the following locations:
  • Vermont
  • Buffalo, New York
  • El Paso, Texas
  • Atlanta, Georgia
  • San Diego, California.
DOS will also establish public counters at two existing locations, the National Passport Center in Portsmouth, NH, and the Arkansas Passport Center in Hot Springs, AR.

The Press Release notes that
"These new agencies will be open to the public and will provide the citizens of these communities with easy access to the full range of passport services. These agencies will have the capability to issue passports onsite and provide same-day service to qualified applicants."
DOS opened a new apssport agency in Detroit in March, and plans to open facilities in Dallas and Tucson later this summer.

Friday, June 12, 2009

H-1B cap count updated - number reduced

USCIS has updated the H-1B cap count, and now says it has 1,300 fewer cases than last time. It now has 44,400 cases against the regular (non-Master's) H-1B cap, compared with 47,500 on May 29. We wonder if this means that 1,300 cases have been denied or withdrawn, or if CIS discovered duplicate filings that it rejected. For more information, see the previous blog post here and here.

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

DHS Establishes Interim Relief for Widows of U.S. Citizens

I recently blogged about a court case which held that a woman from Cambodia could continue with her permanent residence (green card) application although her US citizen husband had died before the paperwork was processed. US immigration service argued that the woman no longer qualified as a "spouse" since her husband had died before the case was approved.

Yesterday, U.S. DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano granted deferred action for two years to widows and widowers of U.S. citizens and children under 18 years old, who live in the US and who were married for less than two years before their spouse’s death.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is to suspend adjudication of visa petitions and adjustment applications filed for widow(er)s where the sole reason for reassessment of immigration status was the death of a U.S. citizen spouse prior to the second anniversary of the marriage.

DHS Establishes Interim Relief for Widows of U.S. Citizens

Shared via AddThis

Visa Bulletin for July 2009 released

The US Department of State has released the new Visa Bulletin for June 2009. In family-based categories, there is very slight movement forward, but just by a few weeks in most categories. Some categories do not advance at all. Mexico FB-1 has retrogressed by 22 months. and FB-3 by 16 months.

Employment-based categories have not changed for 1st preference applicants, and the entire 3rd preference and Other Workers category remains "Unavailable", like it was in May and June. The biggest change is that the priority date for China EB-2 category has retrogressed from 2/15/05 in June to 1/1/00 in July. Sadly, this is similar to what happened with India EB-2 last month.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Immigration rights for gay couples?


Sen. Patrick Leahy ( D-Vermont ) introduced the Uniting American Families Act ( S. 424 ) earlier this year; it has 18 co-sponsors. The bill would allow same sex couples the same immigration rights as married heterosexual couples. Passage of the bill is likely to be tied to overall immigration reform.

At the moment, same-sex partners of legal immigrants do not have the same rights to dependent status that heterosexual spouses get. This is true even if the couple is legally married in their home country. Often, the "dependent" partner must apply for a B-2 visitor visa at the consulate, to accompany his/her partner. This visa is discretionary, and consulates could refuse to issue it. In addition, B-2 status does not allow the dependent partner to work in the US. Many heterosexual dependent spouses have a status that doesn't allow them to work either, however.

As the New York Times reports:

Senator Leahy’s bill would add the term “permanent partner” to sections of current immigration law that refer to married couples, and would provide a legal definition of those terms.

“I just think it’s a matter of fairness,” he said Tuesday in an interview, noting that a number of American allies, including Canada, France and Germany, recognize same-sex couples in immigration law.
Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/boscobridalexpos/

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Can I change from H-1B to F-1?


I have written a couple of blog postings about the effect of layoffs on H-1B workers (see links below). Another common question in this regard is whether the H-1B worker can change to F-1 status and, perhaps, change back to H-1B again if they find another job. Some actual examples of the questions are:
"If I am on H1B visa but I have been laid off by my current employer and they will announce my leaving in one month. I am planning to change to F1 status. If I get another employer later on that sponsor again my visa. Do I get subject to a cap?"

"I have been on an H1B visa for 2.5 years; I am considering attending grad school in Minnesota for my MSME in the Fall, so I would be switching to an F-1 student visa.
My question is: if after I graduate with my Master's Degree, I apply for & get another H1B job - so I switch from F-1 back to H1B visa - do I get a fresh 6 year timeclock started on my new H1B? Or, do I only have 3.5 years left that I can be in H1B status - because of my H1B work time before the F-1/grad school?"

"I have been on the H-1B visa for 1 and a half years.I was laid off recently and am planning to attend school which starts in July 09.
i) Do I need a F-1 visa apart from an I-20?
ii) Do I need to go out of US for stamping?"
Answer:

H-1B to F-1:

A H-1B holder can change fro H-1B to F-1 if she meets all the requirements for F-1 status, including having nonimmigrant intent. "Nonimmigrant intent" means that she needs to show that she intends intend to return to her home country at the end of her studies. Having been here in H-1B status, especially if she has been here a long time, makes it more difficult to show the required nonimmigrant intent. If the applicant or her employer has filed for permanent residence, this completely contradicts nonimmigrant intent.

Despite these warnings, it is not impossible to prove nonimmigrant intent. In addition to this evidence, the F-1 applicant needs to show (a) that she has enrolled in a school and has an endorsed I-20; (b) that she has sufficient funds to pay the expenses for and dependents while studying; and (c) that she will be maintaining status up to the start of classes.

Do I need to leave the US to get an F-1 visa?

The F-1 application could be decided in a number of ways, assuming it is not denied completely. At best, the foreign national could get approval for an automatic change of status to F-1. This would operate to automatically change the foreign national's status to F-1 without the need to leave the US.

However, if the applicant cannot prove maintenance of status,
CIS might just approve the F-1 part of the petition, but not the automatic change of status part. This means that the foreign national would need to leave the US and get an F-1 visa at a consulate before returning in F-1 status. The consulate will need eveidence of nonimmigrant intent, as explained above.

Please see here for the difference between "visa" and "status".

Changing back to H-1B later


If the foreign national finds a new employer who files a new H-1B petition, this new petition is not subject to the H-1B cap. The foreign national has already been included in the cap within the past 6 years, so he is not counted again. The only way that the employee would be subject to the cap again is if (a) he used a full 6 years in H-1B status, and then spent one full year outside the US; OR (b) was moving from a cap-exempt H-1B employer to a cap-subject employer.

************

Prior postings on layoffs here.

Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/david55king/

Monday, June 1, 2009

USCIS reminds some people to get Advance Parole before traveling

USCIS has issued a reminder to certain foreign nationals that they need Advance Parole to travel outside the US. These applicants include people who have:
  • been granted Temporary Protected Status (TPS);
  • a pending application for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident;
  • a pending application for relief under section 203 of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA 203);
  • a pending asylum application; or
  • a pending application for legalization.
People who have been admitted as refugees or granted asylum, including those who are applying for adjustment of status, do not need to obtain Advance Parole. Instead, they apply for a Refugee Travel Document using Form I-131 and comply with applicable application requirements, such as biometric processing, before leaving the US.


IMPORTANT: some people who entered legally and overstayed their authorized period of admission are subject to bars on re-entering the US if they leave. People who overstayed by 180 days are barred for 3 years, and an overstay of one year leads to a 10-year bar. Traveling on Advance Parole does not prevent the bars applying, so you should NOT travel, even with Advance Parole, if you think you might be subject to the bars.


Friday, May 29, 2009

H-1B cap count update - 45,700 now used.


USCIS updated the H-1B cap count for Fiscal Year 2010. It now has 45,700 cases against the regular (non-Master's) H-1B cap. For more information, see the previous blog posts here and here

Thursday, May 28, 2009

New guidance issued on H-1Bs for healthcare workers


The US Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) has issued new guidance on the standards for adjudicating H-1B petitions filed on behalf of beneficiaries seeking employment in a health-care specialty occupation.

The memo suggests that adjudicators should first consult the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) to determine whether the position qualifies as a H-1B "specialty occupation" as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act.

The memo addresses licensing requirements for health-care workers in detail, and the effect of having a license - or not having a license - on approval of a case. If the foreign national has the required license, the adjudicator should not "look beyond the license." If the foreign national has a restricted license (e.g., license approved except for mandatory supervised practice), and the petition is otherwise approvable, an adjudicator should approve the petition for one year, or the duration of the restricted license, whichever is longer.


If the employee does not have the license because s/he needs certain immigration documents before getting a license, CIS can approved the petition for one year. The memo says that
"The approval of any such H-1B petition shall not constitute approval by USCIS for the alien beneficiary to engage in any activity requiring possession of such State or local license. It is merely a means to facilitate the state or local licensing authority’s issuance of such a license to the alien, provided all other requirements are satisfied."
Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/adrianclarkmbbs/

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

An end to the "widow penalty?"


A court in Massachusetts (Taing v. Napolitano) has held that a woman from Cambodia could continue with her permanent residence application although her US citizen husband died before the paperwork was processed. The US immigration service (CIS) argued that Mrs. Taing no longer qualified as a "spouse" since her husband had died before the case was approved.

This controversial so-called "widow penalty" has been the subject of many news articles, listed
here. The New York Times recently called on the government to end this penalty also.

Mrs. Taing entered the US in 2004. Later that year, she married her late husband and they filed the relevant immigration paperwork. Six months later, Mr. Taing tragically died, before the immigration filings were approved. USCIS denied the permanent residence application, on the basis that Mrs. Taing was no longer a "spouse."
The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit agreed with the Sixth and Ninth Circuit court's views that the plaintiff in this situation remained a "spouse" and that she should not be penalized because CIS didn't adjudicate the case quickly enough.
Although we rest our holding on entirely legal grounds, we note that our decision comports with common sense. We do not believe that Congress intended for the speed at which immigration authorities attend to a pending application to be dispositive in determining when a surviving spouse like Mrs. Taing, who has diligently followed the rules, can qualify as [a spouse.] As our sister court has recently noted, the result the government seeks would "create[] an arbitrary, irrational and inequitable outcome in which approvable petitions will be treated differently depending solely upon when the government grants the approval." Lockhart, 561 F.3d at 620 (quoting Robinson, 554 F.3d at 371 (Nygaard, J., dissenting)).
Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/ninjaneil902/

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Colebrook, N.H., rises up to save French bakery - The Boston Globe


Colebrook, N.H., rises up to save French bakery - The Boston Globe

I love this story about how the residents of this small town persuaded the US consulate in Paris to approve a visa. The owner of the bakery had applied for a new E-2 (investor) visa, and was initially denied because the consulate didn't think her bakery business was profitable enough.
"They began sending letters to the US Embassy in Paris. They lobbied their congressmen to get behind their appeal. They signed a petition by the hundreds and sent it to American diplomats several thousand miles away.

Their argument:
The bakery might not earn huge sums of money, but it contributed plenty to the community, providing a place for residents to gather, while offering hope that a small business, even one as unlikely as the boulangerie, could thrive in their town."

The petition was successful, and the US consulate overturned their denial and approved the E-2 visa.

Posted using ShareThis
Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/fooey/

Thursday, May 21, 2009

President Obama schedules immigration reform meeting for June 8


The online political website Politico.com has revealed that President Obama has invited members of Congress to the White House on June 8 to discuss immigration reform. Officials are vague as to the purpose of the meeting, saying:

"The meeting will be an opportunity to launch a policy conversation that we hope will be able to start a debate that will take place in Congress later in the year....This isn’t a forum or a summit with outside groups, this is solely a meeting with members of Congress on both sides of the aisle and both sides of the issue."

There has been much speculation on whether President Obama plans to tackle comprehensive immigration reform this year or now (see earlier blog posts). Maybe we will get more indication of his intentions after the meeting next month.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

H-1B cap count updated - 45,500 now used

USCIS updated the H-1B cap count for Fiscal year 2010. It now has 45,500 cases against the regular (non-Master's) H-1B cap.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Emigration from Mexico to US down by 25%

The New York Times today reports that census data from the Mexican government show a steep decline in emigration from Mexico to the US.

The recently released data show that about 226,000 fewer people emigrated from Mexico to other countries during the year that ended in August 2008 than during the previous year, a decline of 25 percent. All but a very small fraction of emigration, both legal and illegal, from Mexico is to the United States.
The article attributes the decline to the poor US job economy and lack of jobs for emigrants in the US. However, apparently there has not been a corresponding increase in the number of Mexicans returning to live in Mexico:
Still, at least 11 million illegal immigrants remain in the United States, the demographers say. Despite collapsing job markets in construction and other low-wage work, there has been no exodus among Mexicans living in the United States, the Mexican census figures show. About the same number of migrants — 450,000 — returned to Mexico in 2008 as in 2007.
Some commentators claim that the decrease is as a result of increased enforcement of immigration laws at the border and in the workplace. However, other sources in the article claim that enforcement is only a slight deterrent to Mexicans crossing illegally and that the poor job market is much more significant.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

New US entry documents required from June 1, 2009


On June 1, 2009, the U.S. government will implement the full requirements of the land and sea phase of WHTI (Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative). Everyone traveling by air must now have a passport or other valid travel document to enter or re-enter the United States. The proposed rules require most US citizens entering the United States at sea or land ports of entry to have a passport, passport card, or other travel document approved by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Those other documents include:
  • Trusted Traveler Cards (NEXUS, SENTRI, or FAST)
  • State Issued Enhanced Driver's License (when available)
  • Enhanced Tribal Cards (when available)
  • U.S. Military Identification with Military Travel Orders
  • U.S. Merchant Mariner Document when traveling in conjunction with official maritime business
  • Native American Tribal Photo Identification Card
  • Form I-872 American Indian Card
US citizen children under the age of 16 will be able to present the original or copy of their birth certificate, or other proof of US citizenship such as a naturalization certificate or citizenship card.

The US passport card costs $45 and is valid for 10 years. It cannot be used for international air travel. Information on the card is here. DHS states that it has issued 1 million cards so far and is taking 4-6 weeks for approval.

More information on the WHTI and documentary requirements is available at the DHS website here and here and on the Customs and Border Protection website here.

Photo by Mohan S.

Friday, May 8, 2009

Visa Bulletin for June 2009 released


The US Department of State has released the new Visa Bulletin for June 2009. In family-based categories, there is very slight movement forward, but just by a few weeks in most categories. Some categories do not advance at all, but none have retrogressed.

Employment-based categories have not changed for 1st preference applicants, and the entire 3rd preference and Other Workers category is "Unavailable", like it was in May. The biggest change is that the priority date for India EB-2 category has retrogressed from 2/15/04 in May to 1/1/00 in June. This is bad news for 2nd preference applicants from India, unfortunately.

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

H-1B cap count updated May 4 - no change


According to USCIS, the agency has still just received 45,000 new H-1B petitions towards the regular cap of 65,000. See here for details.

Monday, May 4, 2009

Worksite Enforcement Fact Sheet issued by ICE

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued a new Fact Sheet last week with FAQs on ICE's worksite enforcement procedures, figures, and reasons. The Fact Sheet explains that in Fiscal Year 2008
  • Of the individuals criminally arrested, 135 were owners, managers, supervisors or human resources employees facing charges including harboring or knowingly hiring illegal aliens. The remaining workers criminally arrested are facing charges including aggravated identity theft and Social Security fraud.
  • ICE has also made more than 5,100 administrative arrests for immigration violations during worksite enforcement operations.
  • ICE made more than 1,100 criminal arrests tied to worksite enforcement investigations.
In April 2009, Secretary Napolitano issued guidance outlining that ICE will focus its resources in the worksite enforcement program on the criminal prosecution of employers who knowingly hire illegal workers in order to target the root cause of illegal immigration. ICE will continue to arrest and process for removal any illegal workers who are found in the course of these worksite enforcement actions in a manner consistent with immigration law and DHS priorities. Furthermore, ICE will use all available civil and administrative tools, including civil fines and debarment, to penalize and deter illegal employment.


Wednesday, April 29, 2009

US consulates in Mexico suspend non-essential services


The U.S. Embassy in Mexico City and all U.S. Consulates throughout the country have suspended all non-essential services to the public until May 6, due to the swine flu outbreak. Consular services for U.S. citizens will be limited to emergency assistance and to citizenship applications (passports and consular reports of birth abroad). See here for the embassy notice. The consulates will reschedule appointments that have been cancelled.

For more information, see the
State Department Travel Alert and the CDC notices.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

H-1B cap count updated

According to USCIS, the agency has now received new 45,000 H-1B petitions towards the regular cap of 65,000. See here for details.

Monday, April 27, 2009

H-1B and L-1B Visa Reform Act introduced in Congress

Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) today introduced the H-1B and L-1 Visa Reform Act - narrowly-tailored bipartisan legislation that would, in their words,
reform the H-1B and L-1 guest-worker programs to prevent abuse and fraud and to protect American workers.
Senator Durbin's website states the following:
The H-1B visa program should complement the U.S. workforce, not replace it,” Durbin said. “Congress created the H-1B visa program so an employer could hire a foreign guest-worker when a qualified American worker could not be found. However, the H-1B visa program is plagued with fraud and abuse and is now a vehicle for outsourcing that deprives qualified American workers of their jobs. Our bill will put a stop to the outsourcing of American jobs and discrimination against American workers.
The Reform Act would
  • Require all employers who want to hire an H-1B guest-worker to first make a good-faith attempt to recruit a qualified American worker. Employers would be prohibited from using H-1B visa holders to displace qualified American workers;
  • Prohibit the of “H-1B only” ads and prohibit employers from hiring additional H-1B and L-1 guest-workers if more than 50% of their employees are H-1B and L-1 visa holders;
  • Allow DOL to initiate investigations without a complaint and without the Labor Secretary’s personal authorization;
  • Authorize DOL to review H-1B applications for fraud;
  • Allow DOL to conduct random audits of any company that uses the H-1B program; and
  • Require DOL to conduct annual audits of companies who employ large numbers of H-1B workers.

Friday, April 24, 2009

DREAM Act debate


The New York Times has a discussion this week on the DREAM Act. This legislation, sponsored by Senators Richard Durbin (D) of Illinois, and Richard Lugar (R) of Indiana, addresses the situation faced by young people who were brought to the United States years ago as undocumented immigrant children and who have since grown up here, stayed in school, and kept out of trouble. If enacted, the DREAM (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors) Act would
  • Permit certain immigrant students who have grown up in the U.S. to apply for temporary legal status and to eventually obtain permanent status and become eligible for U.S. citizenship if they go to college or serve in the U.S. military; and
  • Eliminate a federal provision that penalizes states that provide in-state tuition without regard to immigration status.
Supporter of the legislation argue that
It would give lawful status to children brought to America by events beyond their control. They have grown up here, are fully integrated, and know no other country. Instead of being rounded up and deported, they will contribute to America, starting when they meet requirements that they go to college or serve in the military.
Opponents say that it is an amnesty
designed to politically leverage the dilemma of the most sympathetic group of illegals into a more general amnesty.
The most recent status of the DREAM Act is that a bipartisan group of senators introduced it to the latest Congress on March 26, 2009. AILA (the American Immigration Lawyers Association) estimates that 65,000 undocumented young people who have spent their childhoods in America would be impacted by this important piece of legislation annually.

The
College Board, the nation's recognized leader in assisting students in the transition to higher education, recently issued a report supporting the DREAM Act.

Photo by Lisa Weston

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

H-1B count now at 44,000


USCIS has released the latest count of FY 2010 H-1B petition filings.

According to the CIS website

USCIS has received approximately 44,000 H-1B petitions counting toward the Congressionally-mandated 65,000 cap. The agency continues to accept petitions subject to the general cap.

Additionally, the agency has received approximately 20,000 petitions for aliens with advanced degrees; however, we continue to accept advanced degree petitions since experience has shown that not all petitions received are approvable.

For cases filed for premium processing during the initial five-day filing window, the 15-day premium processing period began April 7.

USCIS will provide regular updates on the processing of FY2010 H-1B petitions. The updates can be found on the USCIS’ Web site at www.uscis.gov/h-1b_count.

Photo thanks to aussiegall

Monday, April 20, 2009


CIS has issued the latest processing time goal and report here. In a 2007 fee rule, CIS aimed to reduce processing times by 20% by 2009. CIS is meeting its goals in some ares, e.g. EAD applications, I-129 petitions (2 month goal) and I-131 applications (3 month goal). In some other popular cases, processing times are well behind the goals, e,g, I-140 petitions (9 month processing vs 4 month goal), I-751 Removal of Conditions (9 month processing vs 6 month goal), Adjustment of Status for family (7.3 month processing vs 4 month goal). We have seen many cases take less than the posted processing times, especially naturalization applications. However there are also cases taking longer.

Friday, April 17, 2009

Federal Contractor E-verify rule delayed until June 30, 2009

What is E-Verify?


E-Verify is an Internet based system operated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA) that allows participating employers to electronically verify the employment eligibility of their newly hired employees.


Background to the new rule:


President George W Bush issued an executive order in 2008, directing federal agencies to require that federal contractors agree to electronically verify the employment eligibility of their employees. The amended Executive Order reinforces the policy, first announced in 1996, that the federal government do business with companies that have a legal workforce. This new rule requires federal contractors to agree, through language inserted into their federal contracts, to use E-Verify to confirm the employment eligibility of all persons hired during a contract term, and to confirm the employment eligibility of federal contractors’ current employees who perform contract services for the federal government within the United States.

The effective date of the final rule requiring certain federal contractors and subcontractors to use E-Verify has been delayed until June 30, 2009.


Who is affected?


The rule will only affect federal contractors who are awarded a new contract after June 30 that includes the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) E-Verify clause (73 FR 67704). Federal contractors may NOT use E-Verify to verify current employees until the rule becomes effective and they are awarded a contract that includes the FAR E-Verify Clause.


What contracts are included?


The E-Verify requirement would apply to federal contracts with a performance period longer than 120 days and a value over $100,000. The rule covers subcontractors if a prime contract includes the clause. For subcontracts that flow from those prime contracts, the rule extends the E-Verify requirement to subcontracts for services or for construction with a value over $3,000.


See USCIS FAQs on E-Verify

Previous E-verify post



Thursday, April 16, 2009

Border Czar announced by President Obama

President Obama has chosed Alan Bersin to work with DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano to handle illegal immigration and drug violence issues along the Mexican-American border. Mr. Bersin held a similar position under Attorney General Janet Reno in the 1990s. His official title will be Assistant Secretary for International Affairs and Special Representative for Border Affairs.

Time magazine quotes Bersin as saying
What's going on in Mexico, across the border, in Juarez, requires that we support the government of Mexico in its very valiant, courageous effort to both stem violence and also deal with the drug trafficking organizations.
The Obama administration has promised to target border violence and work with Mexican authorities to curb drugs and arms trafficking. Hundreds of federal agents, along with high-tech surveillance gear and drug-sniffing dogs, are being deployed to the Southwest.

As reported by
CNN, Bersin is a former California secretary of education, superintendent of San Diego City Schools and practicing private attorney.

DHS has issued a detailed Fact Sheet explaining its approach toguarding the southern border. The goals are to:


1. Guard against violent crime spillover into the United States;
2.
Support Mexico's crackdown campaign against drug cartels in Mexico; and
3. Reduce the movement of contraband in both directions across the border.

DHS aims to do this by the following initiatives:
  • Doubling Border Enforceement Security Task Force Staffing

  • Tripling DHS Intel Analysts on the SWB

  • Increasing ICE Attaché Personnel in Mexico by 50 percent

  • Doubling Violent Criminal Alien Sections Assignments

  • Quadrupling the Number of Border Liaison Officers

  • Bolstering Secure Communities Biometric Identification Deployment

  • Implementing 100% Southbound Rail Screening

  • Increased Maritime Interdiction Operations

  • Immediate Port of Entry resources enhancements

  • Periodic Evaluation and Review of the SWB Initiative.


Photo courtesy of Paul Garland

Friday, April 10, 2009

Update on President Obama's immigration reform proposals


The New York Times reported on Wednesday that President Obama planned to push immigration reform as a priority in 2010. This report generated a lot of comment and controversy, not surprisingly, given that immigration reform is a controversial topic at any time, but especially in a recession. CNN.com now states that
Multiple Obama administration officials tell CNN that the White House is not pushing to pass a comprehensive immigration reform bill this year.....There are roughly 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States. In addition to making a way for some of them to stay in the country legally, CNN has learned the Obama administration wants to remove incentives to enter the U.S. illegally, beef up border security and work with Mexico to cut down on illegal immigration.
The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) has published a letter commending President Obama on his plans to reform immigration. AILA comments that
Moving forward with comprehensive immigration reform will ensure that all workers are here legally, will punish unscrupulous employers who undercut their honest competitors, and will restore integrity to the labor market. It will lift wages for workers, ensure all workers are paying taxes, restore fairness to our immigration system, and create a level playing field for law-abiding employers. We laud the administration for seeing past the political and emotional rhetoric to the truth that what our country needs to climb out of the crisis toward economic growth and stability.
Links to other online discussions:
Huffington Post
Wall Street Journal (Rahm Emanuel backing immigration reform)
New York Times
Fox News

Photo courtesy of Realjameso16

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Visa Bulletin for May 2009 released


The US Department of State has released the new Visa Bulletin for May 2009. In family-based categories, there is very slight movement forward, but just by a few weeks in most categories. Some categories do not advance at all, but none have retrogressed.

Employment-based categories have not changed for 1st and 2nd preference applicants. However, the entire 3rd preference and Other Workers category is "Unavailable", meaning that nobody in that category can file in May, even with a very old priority date.

Visa Bulletin
Priority Dates and Preference Categories explained


Wednesday, April 8, 2009

H-1B cap may not have been reached yet

USCIS has announced that it is continuing to accept H-1B cases that are subject to the Fiscal Year 2010 cap. This means that the agency might not have received enough petitions within the first few days of filing to reach the quota. If this is the case, this would be the first time in years that the cap was not reached immediately. This also means that any cases received by CIS before today should be accepted for H-1B processing and should not be entered in a random lottery. Any cases received after today may be too late, however we won't know when the cap has been reached until after this happens.

See Press Release here.

For my previous posting about the H-1B cap, click here.

Monday, April 6, 2009

Q&A on new I-9 requirements issued by USCIS

As a follow-up to last week's blog posting about the new I-9 requirements starting on April 3, USCIS has released a Question and Answer document for employers here. The Q&A answers questions such as
  • What is the difference between the revised Form I-9 and the old one?
  • Why can’t I present an expired document?
  • As an employer, can I accept documents that used to be on the Form I-9 but aren’t now?
  • Do I need to complete the revised version of the Form I-9 for all my employees or just the new ones?
Previous blog posting: http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2009/04/are-you-ready-new-i-9-requirements-take.html.